DOTS: 1932 (?) Ford

Kinja'd!!! "Bandit" (2bandit)
10/13/2013 at 19:24 • Filed to: dots

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 3
Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!!

Sorry the pics are bad, my potato does not do low light. The car was tastefully done. If only the rear tires were a bit bigger.


DISCUSSION (3)


Kinja'd!!! Bob Loblaw Made Me Make a Phoney Phone Call to Edward Rooney > Bandit
10/14/2013 at 10:34

Kinja'd!!!0

It's bad enough that it has radials, it definitely doesn't need wider rears! (plenty pragmatic, but pragmatism has no place in hot rods!)

And it's either a '32 Model B or a pre '32 Model A, no such thing as a '32 Model A; that right there is a '32, though.


Kinja'd!!! Bandit > Bob Loblaw Made Me Make a Phoney Phone Call to Edward Rooney
10/14/2013 at 18:12

Kinja'd!!!0

Cool, thanks for the info. I'm not that well versed on pre-war cars.

I meant it needs taller rear tires. I like this:

Kinja'd!!!

I also like when wheels match:

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Bob Loblaw Made Me Make a Phoney Phone Call to Edward Rooney > Bandit
10/14/2013 at 18:21

Kinja'd!!!1

Absolutely man, it took me a hot minute to get that distinction through my head when I first learned they weren't the same.

And nevermind, you're absolutely correct on taller tires. I'm a fan of the non-staggered stance as well, something about it just seems right.

Party on!